Re: [ga] NC recommendation on the GA

["Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin@law.miami.edu>]

That's nice.  We don't feel improved byi it.  Please try again.

On Thu, 16 May 2002, Philip Sheppard wrote:

> GA,
> Let me provide context to recommendation 24 from the Names Council.
> This was based on an earlier analysis of the current two roles of the GA provided by the GA Chair:
> 1. a forum for broad inter-constituency exchange
> 2. a channel by which individuals and parties not fitting into the constituency scheme participate in policy-making.
> 
> The recommendations' objective is to KEEP those two roles and IMPROVE both of them by a separation.  Don't be confused by use of the generic term "general assembly". The second objective is captured in recommendation 25, which seems not to have been posted before. And an earlier recommendation (19), also sought to incorporate new stakeholders.
> Philip
> ---------------------------------

		Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   froomkin@law.tm
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
                        -->It's hot here.<--

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html