<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Re: Transfers: Apparent Authority Discussion
- To: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Transfers: Apparent Authority Discussion
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 18:00:03 -0700
- CC: mcade@att.com, roessler@does-not-exist.org, Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr, RJS@lojo.co.nz, synthesis@videotron.ca, nick.wood@nom-iq.com, grant.forsyth@clear.co.nz, crusso@verisign.com, mcf@uwm.edu, orobles@nic.mx, james.love@cptech.org, gen full <ga-full@dnso.org>
- Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
- References: <9a.25f99618.2a1fbd37@cs.com> <022401c20343$96d922e0$040a000a@RRADER2K>
- Sender: owner-ga-full@dnso.org
Ross and all assembly members,
Despite you recent rancor towards myself and our members/organization,
and surprisingly enough to even myself, I find that I am in agreement with
your view and/or comments below. I believe, but do not know for sure,
that a majority of our members would be in agreement as well...
Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
> >
> > In the document that is not "your draft", it is written:
> >
> > "The Task Force suggests that, after further examination, that apparent
> > authority is a well-defined legal concept and the lack of specific
> definition
> > within the relevant body of ICANN policy should not be a barrier to the
> work
> > of this task force to make policy recommendations."
> >
> > Why continue to be obtuse? Is there a particular reason why you will not
> > provide a specific definition?
>
> Speaking from a drafting team perspective, what is obtuse about the present
> legal definition of AA? IANAL, but in agency law, the specific definition is
> pretty clear.
>
> > Further, what problems do you have with the
> > Australian model as cited?
>
> Speaking from a personal/Tucows/Constituency member perspective the
> Australian model is one of the finest examples of avoiding the tough
> problems that I have seen in a long time. I am sure that it works within the
> confines of their limited scope, but until CP/IP gains wider support, using
> tree-bark to conduct business in a global market over the Internet remains
> silly.
>
> With that being said, I am sure that if there is any interest within the TF
> in exploring the .au model then I am sure that it will be discussed. My
> initial reaction is that it won't be a very productive discussion in that it
> solves the wrong problems.
>
> -rwr
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|