<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Re: [atlarge-discuss] role of voting
James and all stakeholders of interested parties,
Agreed that Thomas's opinions at times regarding stakeholders/users
voting on issues that effect them seems to be somewhat questionable
in relation to the MoU and the White Paper. I think he is following
the Marilyn Cade-BC ( Business Constituency ) line myself...
James Love wrote:
> On the GA list there is an often bitter debate over whether or not we can
> vote on particular measures, and if we pass those measures, are the votes
> important or unimportant, and what makes a particular vote "important.", or
> does encouraging participation mean one is "ballot stuffing" and on and on.
> I would ask Thomas R, who is quite opinionated on these issues in his web
> log and on the GA list, what his views of this are for the at large.
>
> Jamie
>
> --------------------------------
> James Love mailto:james.love@cptech.org
> http://www.cptech.org +1.202.387.8030 mobile +1.202.361.3040
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|