Re: [ga] your comments

[DannyYounger@cs.com]

Joe writes:  Today, many people marginalize themselves by taking a black or 
white approach -- e.g., direct elections are the only acceptable way to be 
accountable.

With all due respect, the question that one might ask is the following:  
After having budgeted $450,000 for an At-Large study, and after having been 
told by those charged with completing the year-long study (this included the 
former Chairman of ICANN), that "an At-Large membership registration and 
election process can be developed that meets standards of integrity, fairness 
and affordability" ( http://www.atlargestudy.org/final_report.shtml ), why 
has the Board not accepted the recommendations of its own Blue-Ribbon panel 
that reflects the consensus view of the community?  

Aren't we a consensus-based organization?  Do we now have a Board that no 
longer respects consensus?


   






--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html