<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Re: Press Credentials and INET2002
Thanks!
-Declan
At 06:05 PM 6/3/2002 -0400, Melissa Byrd wrote:
>Declan,
>
>BNA was actually approved for credentials this morning. To clarify, I
>simply asked the reporter to tell me more information about herself before
>I offered her credentials, as her initial email to me was vague.
>
>Thank you,
>Melissa Byrd
>
>
>At 05:57 PM 6/3/02 -0400, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>>Richard,
>>Thanks once again. A quick followup: I understand that BNA also was
>>denied credentials. Can you confirm that? If that is the case, can you
>>explain why?
>>Thanks,
>>Declan
>>
>>
>>At 02:32 PM 6/3/2002 -0700, Richard Perlman wrote:
>>>The following message was forwarded to me for response - you are receiving
>>>this message because your e-mail address, or a list you subscribe to was
>>>listed somewhere in that message. The response, included below, was
>>>originally prepared for an ISOPC mailing list, but is being resent here,
>>>since it appropriately addresses the topic in question - ISOC/INET press
>>>credentials policy.
>>>
>>>Richard Perlman
>>>ISOC - VP for Conferences
>>> > =============== Copy starts here ================
>>> > Subject: FC: Internet Society denies press credentials to online
>>> > publication
>>> > Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2002 16:35:35 -0400
>>> > From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
>>> > To: politech@politechbot.com
>>> > CC: , mbyrd@foretec.com, jrh29@columbia.edu,
>>> > observer@westnet.com
>>> >
>>> > [I hope this is a simple misunderstanding and the good folks at the
>>> > Internet Society can clear it up. Disclaimer: I ran for the board of
>>> > directors of the Internet Society four years ago. (I lost.) --Declan]
>>> >
>>> > ---
>>>
>>>To all those concerned with issues regarding Press Passes for INET2002:
>>>
>>>This morning I have been able to assemble what I think is a complete account
>>>of the issues surrounding the request for Press credentials for the Amateur
>>>Computerist. The rest of this letter outlines what I have learned and my
>>>response to the situation.
>>>
>>>The request for two press passes for INET2002 from the "Amateur Computerist"
>>>was received by Foretec on May 19th. At that time (less than a month before
>>>the conference) Press Credentials had already been issued to 46 persons from
>>>31 different organizations. Note that contract between ISOC and Foretec
>>>specifies an explicit limit of 50 press passes for the conference. Four
>>>passes were being held in reserve for last minute requests from major media
>>>organizations (Network/National TV, Radio etc.).
>>>
>>>After speaking with the people at Foretec who are managing press
>>>credentials, it is clear that what they had intended to state in their
>>>letter to Amateur Computerist was that the remaining passes were being
>>>reserved for high visibility organizations. It is unfortunate that the
>>>message created the incorrect impression that this selectivity applied to
>>>all 50 passes - it clearly did not, as can be seen from the list of
>>>organizations below. People working long hours do sometimes make mistakes.
>>>Both Foretec and ISOC apologize for any confusion that may have been caused
>>>by the wording of the e-mail response to the Amateur Computerist. An offer
>>>to be placed on a waiting list was extended to the "Amateur Computerist, but
>>>no response to that offer, or for that matter, any other message has been
>>>received from them by either by Foretec or ISOC.
>>>
>>>I can also report that the information and opinions regarding past
>>>involvement of Amateur Computerist or the principals of that organization in
>>>previous INET conferences was not known to Foretec and did not play any part
>>>in the decision to deny the request for press credentials. After reviewing
>>>the correspondence between Foretec and the Amateur Computerist, I am
>>>convinced that the decision to deny the press credentials was correct, based
>>>on the small number of passes available at the time of their request and the
>>>information provided by Amateur Computertist about the nature and
>>>distribution of their work.
>>>
>>>Accordingly, while I do apologize for the misunderstanding created by the
>>>letter to the Amateur Computerist, it is my opinion that this matter was
>>>otherwise handled fairly, objectively and appropriately by the Foretec
>>>staff.
>>>
>>>Richard Perlman
>>>ISOC - VP for Conferences
>>>
>>>List of organizations issued Press credentials for INET 2002
>>>============================================================
>>>Associated Press USA
>>>CIO Radio and Magazine USA
>>>CNET News USA
>>>Diario ABC Color Paraguay
>>>Direction Informatique et Les Affairs Canada
>>>E-Commerce Magazine India
>>>Europe Magazine EU
>>>eWeek USA
>>>Financial Times USA
>>>Focus Magazine Germany
>>>Foreign Policy USA
>>>Government Computer News Washington DC
>>>Himalmedia Publications Nepal
>>>Hosting Tech USA
>>>Howard University TV Washington DC
>>>Information Services International - Dentsu, ltd. Japan
>>>Internet News Italy
>>>InfoWorld USA
>>>ISOC's On the Internet International
>>>Network World USA
>>>New York Times USA
>>>Newsweek USA
>>>Perl Magazine India
>>>Radio Netherlands Netherlands
>>>San Jose Mercury News Silicon Valley
>>>The Sunday Tribune Ireland
>>>The Washington Post USA
>>>WAMU- Press Washington DC
>>>Washington Internet Daily Washington, DC
>>>Washington Technology Washington, DC
>>>WIRED / Politechbot.com USA/Washington, DC
>
>Melissa Byrd
>Marketing Communications
>
>Foretec Seminars
>5 Commonwealth Road
>Natick, MA 01760
>(508) 650-4020 x224
>MByrd@Foretec.com
>
>Register today for INET 2002!
>www.inet2002.org
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|