ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Re: Redelegation issues


On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, at 08:05 [=GMT-0700], Bret Fausett wrote:

> Yes, but the fact that U.S. registrars aren't screening the country fields
> of their registration templates against the U.S. Treasury regulations
> doesn't mean that they're in compliance with the law. They're all in
> violation. It's trivially easy to do the screening, and sooner or later some
> registrar (or other Internet company doing business globally) is going to
> wind up in Court, or worse. -- Bret

Or worse? Hang them? I think this is a lot adoo about nothing. It is not
something they could use for misiles, is it?

> Asaad Y. Alnajjar - Millennium Inc. wrote:
> > John, if we go by your treasury argument, then at least the leading 25 .com
> > registrars are already in violation of the law by selling thousands of names
> > to citizens of Iraq & Libya. Do a whois query and you will find out for
> > yourself.
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>