Re: [ga] Re: news from bucharest: at large exists again

[Vittorio Bertola <vb@vitaminic.net>]

On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 12:41:53 -0400, you wrote:

>Marc, I think you are missing the point.  It will be easy to get your 
>organization included in the at-large.org thing.  It just doesn't mean 
>anything.   You can't vote or freely choose your own leaders.  You just 
>become a volenteer focus group for the staff, and you get used to allow the 
>board to claim they have an at large.

This is a risk we have to prevent. I think that we can prevent it by
participating in the process and making sure that procedures to (s)elect
ALAC members are bottom-up and not top-down. Of course, if the ALAC members
or organizations would be picked by the NomCom or the Board, the whole thing
would be ridiculous.
-- 
.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo vb.
Vittorio Bertola     <vb@vitaminic.net>    Ph. +39 011 23381220
Vitaminic [The Music Evolution] - Vice President for Technology

DISCLAIMER, PLEASE NOTE: This communication is intended only for use by the
addressee. It may contain confidential or privileged information. 
Transmission, distribution and/or copy cannot be permitted. Please notify
immediately the sender by replying if you are not the intended recipient.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html