<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Re: [atlarge-discuss] ALOC archives?
Danny and all stakeholers or other interested parties,
I tend to agree with you Danny that stakeholders/users, regardless
of status should at the very least be on an equal footing with
respect to representation in any At-Large structure to elect
at least 51% of the ICANN BoD which was polled by the
than ALSC participants as well as many other stakeholders/users.
DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
> Sotiris,
>
> I do have ideas for the ERC, but I question whether they will be supported by
> the folks here...
>
> I prefer an in-your-face approach. Why should the ccTLDs get an SO and the
> ability to elect directors, but not the user community? Why should the
> special interest groups that populate the DNSO get to elect directors, but
> not us?
>
> I would demand nothing less than an SO.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|