Re: [ga] Names Policy Development Process

["todd glassey" <todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net>]

My feeling is that a Root Zone Protocol as a top layer of a DNS resolution
model might be also functional. The idea would be that if there was a Root
Zone specified in the URI/URL then it would be used otherwise the default
set would be (i.e. the ICANN set).

The real win as I have said would be properly outfitted search engines since
these are really the next generation resolution services anyway.

Todd Glassey

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Palmer" <jp@ADNS.NET>
To: "Ga" <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2002 10:07 AM
Subject: Re: [ga] Names Policy Development Process


> >
> > > Todd and all assembly members,
> > >
> > > todd glassey wrote:
> > >
> > > > I still think that ICANN's biggest political and technical hurdle to
> > leap is
> > > > really what to do about other ROOT's.This may seem like a simple
> > business
> > > > question but it has far reaching ramifications that stretch
throughout
> > the
> > > > entirety of what we know as the Internet.
> > >
> > >   ICANN and the other root structures have two choices really.
> > > They can either work together and co-exist and still compete, or
> > > they can be totally diverse.
> >
> > OK but on who's address space, and how could one bridge lookups between
the
> > two DNS Roots?. My take is that DNS and BIND fail this clearly but that
the
> > Search Engines may hold some hope if they can get their bad links cut to
a
> > minimum and provides regularly pruned lookup services.
> >
>
> We were working something called MULTI-BIND, a version of BIND that
> would allow a server operator to do just that. It would even allow the
selection
> of a particular version of a TLD over another one. This way, a server
operator
> could still use the USG root by default and then add in the non-colliding
contents
> of another root server network, or just specific TLDs by specifying name
servers
> for them.
>
> Alas, we got sidetracked onto other projects. Point is, its possible and
another way
> around ICANN.
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html