Re: [ga] Redemption Grace Periods for Deleted Names

["Jon Lawrence" <jon@jonlawrence.com>]

Which would be a fair assumption if, and only if, the WLS was set up such
that the registrar that had the name originally would also get the name
if deleted and re-registered to the WLS subscriber.

I'm pretty sure that is not the case.

jon


>-- Original Message --
>Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 00:30:43 -0700
>To: Marc Schneiders <marc@fuchsia.bijt.net>
>From: Gary Osbourne <gro@direct.ca>
>Subject: Re: [ga] Redemption Grace Periods for Deleted Names
>Cc: ga@dnso.org
>
>
>At 11:34 PM 01/08/02 +0200, Marc Schneiders wrote:
>
>>Assuming that they are good businessmen and therefore
>>trying to keep their customers, it is very unlikely that
>>registrars make it hard for people to renew their domains.
>
>That is assuming that the renewal fee is the same if it is
>the original registrant or someone else. If the renewal fee
>is higher for a new registrant (as is likely to happen with
>WLS), then there is a built in incentive to be less than
>helpful to the original registrant. It is normally a Very
>Good Thing to keep your existing customers, but if new ones
>pay better, though only if you jettison the current ones,
>well, screw the current customer. I gotta make a living. -g
>  
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html