<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: Jeff Williams FAQ was Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [ga] HMS...
On Tue, 6 Aug 2002, William X Walsh wrote:
> Wrong. At least 3 did retract, by editing their stories and reissuing
> them without any reference to Jeff (such as Wired.com's ace reporter),
> and the LA Times reporter he duped also disclaimed him.
thats not a reatraction. like i said - i have yet to see any retraction
concerning jeff. and just editing jeff out of a story is not a
retraction.
a proper retraction is when the news source intentionally writes an
article which retracts jeff as a credible source and says why it did such
a thing. i have yet to see one of those.
regards
joe
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|