Re: Jeff Williams FAQ was Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [ga] HMS...

[eric@hi-tek.com]

Sorry, if ideas are not held accountable in their own logic to you, we
are intractable.
Perhaps I am too young and idealistic.
May peace be everlasting in your garden of refreshment.
I do thank you for you diligence in bringing what you feel important to
the forefront.
If I may ever be of service, please do not hesitate to ask.
My ideas and statements are meant for a different purpose than practical
application in a technical manner.
Your inability to use them reflects my limitation and not yours, for
this I apologize.
Eric

Gary Osbourne wrote:

> At 10:30 AM 06/08/02 -0700, eric@hi-tek.com wrote:
>
> >Should credibility of the personalities of our members
> >be the issue
>
> Well, yes. If I continually receive incorrect or useless
> data from a certain source, I cease to use that source
> and hunt elsewhere. That is how this internet thing works.
>
> >Should issues and Ideas speak for themselves?
>
> They can't. Someone has to put them forward.
>
> >Oh goodness did I leave out the other 120 countries
> >contributing to building a democratic globe whose
> >members of ruling bodies may not meet with Gary's
> >ethical approval.
>
> That's not what I'm doing. While Jeff Williams is
> ethically challenged, he could still be a trusted
> source of accurate, useful information. He isn't.
>
> >How does that go? Judge not lest ye..........
>
> Well, seeing as you're judging me, while I don't
> usually find you a source of entirely incorrect
> information, I do find it almost entirely useless.
>
> In that regard, both Jeff Williams and yourself
> seem to suffer from echolalia (e-cholalia?). -g

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html