<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[fwd] RE: [ga] ICANN reimburse $75,000 to GAC for GAC secretariat (from: richard.hill@itu.int)
- To: ga@dnso.org
- Subject: [fwd] RE: [ga] ICANN reimburse $75,000 to GAC for GAC secretariat (from: richard.hill@itu.int)
- From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 11:37:11 +0200
- Mail-Followup-To: ga@dnso.org
- Organization: Palpatine's office.
- Sender: owner-ga-full@dnso.org
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
----- Forwarded message from richard.hill@itu.int -----
From: richard.hill@itu.int
To: jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Cc: ga@dnso.org, atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 11:28:12 +0200
Subject: RE: [ga] ICANN reimburse $75,000 to GAC for GAC secretariat
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Williams [mailto:jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com]
> Sent: Saturday, 17 August 2002 4:33
> To: richard.hill@itu.int
> Cc: ga@dnso.org; Don Evans; cathy Handley; Clyde Ensslin; atlarge
> discuss list
> Subject: Re: [ga] ICANN reimburse $75,000 to GAC for GAC secretariat
>
>
> Richard and all assembly members, stakeholders or other
> interested parties,
>
> Thank you Richard for passing this bit of info along. Much
> appreciated!
>
> However after reading it several times I came to have a few
> questions..
>
> 2.) Will or has, sense March, the ITU's offer to fund either of these
> positions/fuctions? If not, why not? If so, what was, if any
> the decision?
The ITU did not offer to fund any functions. The ITU offered to provide, as
an in-kind contribution, support for a portion of the secretariat services,
in particular basic support for meetings (note-taking, document handling,
etc.).
Best,
Richard
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Thomas Roessler http://log.does-not-exist.org/
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|