ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] no surprises here




On 20 Aug 2002, at 10:51, Judith Oppenheimer wrote:

> http://www.icannwatch.org/article.php?sid=904&mode=&order=0
> http://www.lextext.com/icann/2002/08/19.html#a677
> 
> ICANNBlog notes that "the Staff Report recommended a winner, rather than
> simply handing the raw data to the Board."
> 
> So what else is new.
> 

Nothing.  ISOC and ICANN are perfect bedfellows.  They both 
disenfranchised individuals in favor of corporate entities.  They both 
funnel money to pet or influential entites.  It's not even a show any 
more.  Next they will disenfranchise individual .org registrants unless 
registered by a bone fide registered non-profit and totally cut off 
individuals who have current registrations and ICANN will do nothing to 
prevent or stop it.

If this doesn't raise a cry from the public world-wide to stop this, I don't 
know what will. 

Leah

> J
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------- Judith Oppenheimer http://JudithOppenheimer.com
> http://ICBTollFreeNews.com http://WhoSells800.com 212 684-7210, 1 800 The
> Expert
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------- Visit 1-800 AFTA, http://www.1800afta.org
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
> 


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>