ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: Relations with the ccTLDs (was Re: [ga] Re: Violations of the Bylaws?


Jeff and all assembly members,

  Jeff's point here is, or should be well taken.  Vint's answer to
Danny's original question to me seemed both inaccurate, after
I again reviewed the ICANN Bylaws, and also evasive to
a degree.  Hence again I, amongst now several other stakeholders/users
believe that Vint or some other member(s) of the ICANN  BoD
should answer Danny's question along the lines Jeff is suggesting
and /or requesting here.  Of course I, for one am not going to
hold my breath waiting for such an answer...

Jeff Field wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]On Behalf Of vinton g.
> > cerf
> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 4:45 AM
> > To: Peter Dengate Thrush
> > Cc: icann board address; ga@dnso.org; Robin Layton; board@aptld.org;
> > cctld-discuss@wtld.org
> > Subject: Re: Relations with the ccTLDs (was Re: [ga] Re: Violations of
> > the Bylaws?
> >
> <---snip--->
> >
> > The DNSO offered several alternatives to the Board including
> > acceptance of WLS, with some built-in requirements - the board
> > adopted that approach.
> >
> <---snip--->
>
> Vint,
>
> With all due respect, the DNSO offered "a primary recommendation, and an
> alternative", *not* "several alternatives to the Board including acceptance
> of WLS".  The Board rejected the primary recommendation ("Recommendation to
> deny the WLS") and went with the alternative recommendation.  The
> alternative recommendation, with conditions, was provided because "The TF
> takes into account that the ICANN Board may not accept the policy
> recommendations noted above for a variety of reasons."; reasons which are
> not laid out in the report but which are apparently assumed to be reasons
> the Board, in its infinite wisdom, may have which are unknown to the DNSO.
> I believe the answer everyone is looking for are the reasons the Board
> rejected the DNSO's primary recommendation.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jeff
>
> --
> jeff field
> 952-848-7626
> 952-848-7627 fax
> jfield@aaaq.com <mailto:jfield@aaaq.com>
> -----
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 127k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 972-244-3801
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>