RE: [ga] A Farce in a Pretty Package

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com>]

Thanks Bret.  Just one more point of clarification.  Is the sixth hurdle
independent in the sense of not being part of ICANN as the IRP was
originally intended?

BTW, I had reviewed Becky's recommendation and thought it was good.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bret Fausett [mailto:fausett@lextext.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 5:58 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck; ga@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [ga] A Farce in a Pretty Package
> 
> 
> Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> > Where is the "independent review?"  How are the other five 
> review steps
> > independent?
> 
> Two uses of "independent." When I said there were six 
> "independent" checks,
> I meant "independent" as in "not dependent on or conditioned 
> by or relative
> to anything else." When I said that one of those checks was 
> "independent"
> review, I meant "independent" as in "free from external control and
> constraint."
> 
> I thought my intention was apparent from context, but just to 
> be clear:
> there are six "distinct" hurdles to cross before something 
> becomes a policy,
> and one of those is "independent review."
> 
> Becky Burr recently submitted a recommendation on how 
> independent review
> might work: 
> http://www.icann.org/committees/evol-reform/afap-report-23aug02.htm
> 
>       -- Bret
> 
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html