Re: [ga] Re: [atlarge-discuss] my comments to the WHOIS Task Force reports

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

Absolutely,

WLS and WHOIS can be intelligently routed around.

But we like to think that intellegent actions should be taken here in the 
ICANN also.

But just like lawyers and doctors have done we make it so complicated as to 
take it out of the hands of the users and into "professionals" hands only.

In cal we have a rule that you cannot file a lawsuit against a doctor 
without another doctor swearing to malpractice (with some exceptions of 
course but you need a lawyer to explain them).  Perhaps we should have a 
similar rule for IP, you cannot file a lawsuit against a domain name holder 
without an ISP swearing that it is the right defendant.  I appeared 3 times 
in court in the 90s because a registrant had an email with us.

"people of petty outlook are fretful,doubting;
the more they hurry, the more they fall behind.
Sticklers always miss the proper measure,
certain to set off on wrong roads."
(HSIN-HSIN-MING)
e
> Each user controls the "content" of their whois information, on a
> name-by-name basis... They do not have to have a web-based result...
> 
> http://whois.cavebear.com
> 
> They can control what they put into the DNS whois...name by name...
> 
http://www.analogx.com/cgi-bin/cgidig.exe?DNS=205.214.45.10&Query=whois.cave
bear.com&Type=255&submit=Lookup
> 
> 
> Jim Fleming
> 2002:[IPv4]:000X:03DB:...IPv8 is closer than you think...
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Eric Dierker" <eric@hi-tek.com>
> To: <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
> Cc: <ga@dnso.org>; <vb@vitaminic.net>
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 1:47 AM
> Subject: Re: [ga] Re: [atlarge-discuss] my comments to the WHOIS Task
> Force reports
> 
> 
>> How can anyone buy into any of this load of crap?
>> 
>> The Whois in its' entirety stinks.
>> 
>> This is IP supterfuge and dead wrong!
>> 
>> Vittorio is wrong in engaging in this dialogue, it hurts privacy
>> rights and  is nothing but a ploy to deny privacy rights.
>> 
>> Sincerely,
>> Eric
>> 
>> --
>> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>> 
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html