<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Re: New TLD Evaluation Process : Specific Question tothe Board
Carl Malamud wrote:
> ok, I'm totally confused. I went back and re-read all the reporting
> requirements in the tld agreements and still can't think of a single example
> of what such proprietary data might be in the various mandated technical
> reports (and I tried *really* hard. :)
The new registries ranked each of the Appendix U reporting requirements into
various categories of confidentiality. I tried to shed a little light on
this practice when it was first disclosed by linking these color-coded
charts from my weblog:
http://www.lextext.com/bizconfidential.htm
(Neustar's confidential designations)
http://www.lextext.com/infoconfidential.htm
(Afilias' confidential designations)
At least in the first instance, the new registries designated over 50% of
their reporting data as having some degree of confidentiality. Silly.
Nevertheless, for most of the early data, the confidentiality period has
expired.
-- Bret
--
Bret Fausett | fausett@lextext.com | http://www.lextext.com
Hancock Rothert & Bunshoft, LLP Los Angeles, California
Follow the ICANN Blog: http://icann.blog.us
___________________________________________________________
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|