Re: [ga] IPC on ALAC

[kent@songbird.com]

On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 10:34:58PM -0400, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
> Steve Metalitz, in providing the "IPC Response to ALAC Assistance Group 
> Report", makes the following comment in one of the footnotes:  
> 
> "The report seems to suggest that a regional at-large structure with as few 
> as 200 individual members could be accredited to exercise responsibilities 
> including direct appointment of a member of the Nominating Committee.  This 
> number appears far too low to justify a claim of representativeness of the 
> range of "individual Internet users" from any region, and certainly from 
> regions in which there are tens or hundreds of millions of such Internet 
> users."
> http://forum.icann.org/reform-comments/alacag/pdf00000.pdf
> 
> As of March 2002, the IPC had only 66 members.

Your comparision is completely off base.  Most of the IPC members are
not individual members, but rather are organizational members which
collectively represents tens of thousands of members.

I know you know this.  Why do you deliberately make such a 
misrepresentation? 


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html