<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Domain names are highly irrelevant in the struggle against spam (Re: [ga] Vint why do none...)
True,
I recently received spam where the spammer had (for my convenience & to
avoid bouncing email since they obviously were not sending from a valid
SMTP host) with my email address in both the from and to sections of the
message.
~kristy
At 02:00 AM 9/18/2002 +0200, Marc Schneiders wrote:
> > At 07:23 AM 9/17/2002 -0700, todd glassey wrote:
>
> > >I get this SPAM this morning
> > >and after doing a header analysis, we find
> > >it comes from a domain
>
>The only thing certain about the origin of an email is the IP of the
>mailserver through which it was sent. In many/most spam messages the
>sender's email address in the header is fake, including the domain name(s)
>involved. Even the hostname of the mailserver is quite often fake. We can
>only rely on the IP.
>
> > >called 99talk.com, registered through the Boy Scouts
> > >of Australia, only the contact email addresses for the domain all
> bounce...
>
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|