ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Re: [atlarge-discuss] Trademark debate


Ha shucks,
did i say wrong?
I was not referring to the UDRP through WIPO which is criminal theft.
I was referring to International treatises and treaties.
We require in the International money community the adherence to international
standards, from rice quality to copy write enforcement to shipping.  Otherwise you
don't get no WB money.
So what is the international standard for running of the internet?
e

Jeff Williams wrote:

> Eric and all stakeholders or other interested parties and members,
>
> eric@hi-tek.com wrote:
>
> > Respectfully Jeff you are wrong, and very dangerously wrong if people follow this
> > logic.
> >
> > WTO and BTAs and UN and all international conventions of business require what is
> > referred to as International standards and that requires some grouping of
> > integrity in an acceptable international community.
>
>   Yes.  What does this have to do with WIPO administering the UDRP
> though Eric?  Nothing really.  True, the UDRP was ram rodded through
> by the than ICANN Interim BoD, but turned over to WIPO to administer.
> Which is what I said.  Hence I fail to see how what you have stated here
> shows that what I said in this regard as wrong...
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>