<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Froomkin's antitrust advice
At 06:10 p.m. 25/09/2002 -0400, Joe Sims wrote:
>I suggest that readers take Professor Froomkin's advice on antitrust with a
>very large grain of salt; it would be an understatement to say he is not an
>antitrust expert. Any competent antitrust lawyer would tell you that
>concluding that something is an antitrust violation without a clear
>understanding of all the facts, considered in the full context of the
>environment in which the specific conduct is taking place, is essentially
>worthless.
Mr Sims,
I read the Froomkin/Lemley draft article, and without giving myself any
credit for competence in this specific area of American law, I do see
merit for the debate here in the points that it raises and precedents that
it presents. I did not read that it was meant as "legal advice".
As for relying on competent anti-trust lawyers in this debate, do you
suggest that this Assembly rely on *practicing* anti-trust lawyers who
have clients to please?
--Joop Teernstra LL.M. (Dutch Law)--
initial webmaster
www.icannatlarge.com
Sign up and spread the word.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|