<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] FW: Comment from the gTLD Registry Constituency
When people work on problems by starting out with premise;
"This is how it is supposed to work, so here is the solution to the problem"
rather than;
"this is how it really works, so here is the solution to the problem"
They create a bigger problem rather than a solution. Mission Creep is a
fact. Any proposed solutions must accept that fact.
(and no the solution is not to get rid of the fact, it is human nature)
Sincerely,
e
> Bret,
>
> I don't think I ignored that at all. But just to clarify, that is why
> ICANN should limit its policy making to a very narrow spectrum of
> issues related to technical and stability issues. Note that I
> definitely said that users should have a strong voice in the polciy
> making process. I just disagree with a small subset of users who
> really do not represent all users running the show so that they can
> push their special interests that are often not the same as the broader
> interests of all users.
>
> Chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bret Fausett [mailto:fausett@lextext.com]
> Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 12:36 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck; DNSO General Assembly
> Subject: Re: [ga] FW: Comment from the gTLD Registry Constituency
>
>
> Chuck,
>
> What your analysis ignores is that ICANN develops policies that are
> binding on users (e.g. UDRP) via the registration contract with
> registrars. Users have no choice in the matter, so the market has no
> ability to ensure that some registrars/registries will "not be
> successful over time" as a result of bad policies. The only way to give
> users a voice in these policies, that are as binding on them as the
> ICANN registry contracts are on your constituency, is through the GNSO.
>
> -- Bret
>
> Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>> At the same time, that does not mean that the impact to those not
>> under contract is not important or even that it is less important. In
>> fact, I would argue that the ultimate users (customers) are what it is
>> all about and, if businesses supporting those users ignore that fact,
>> they will not
> be
>> successful over time.
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|