Re: [ga] FW: Comment from the gTLD Registry Constituency/ccTLD

[eric@hi-tek.com]

Danny and Peter,
Thank you both for your wonderful contributions.

The system is not perfect and there are glitches and economics involved
-
however;

a ccTLD is by its' very essence, theoretically representative of the
relevant
user community.
They are controlled in some way by the governments of that country and
governments by in
large are legitimate. I am sure you can give exceptions but as a general
rule
they are run for the
benefit of the electorate.

Therefor while we may need to straighten out some kinks, the system has
built
into it representativeness.

Eric

DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

> Peter,
>
> I appreciate your sensitivity to user concerns and note that you have asked,
> "Why shouldn't the structure require the registries and registrars to sit
> around the table with their user community?"
>
> In light of this question, can you identify the functional mechanism by which
> relevant user community input will be respected within the proposed ccSO?
> Perhaps that which is proposed within your own SO can offer some structural
> guidance to the GNSO...
>
> best regards,
> Danny
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html