Re: User input in the ccSO (was Re: [ga] FW: Comment from the gTLD Registry Constituency

[Vittorio Bertola <vb@bertola.eu.org>]

On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 18:49:12 -0400, you wrote:

>How can you reconcile a central level with regards to policy for cctld's when 
>the point has been made over and over again that each cctld falls under the 
>laws and conventions of its own country?  Once more, if a country has laws 
>that prohibit a public whois, how can a central policy that mandates a public 
>whois be reconciled?  Answer:  it cannot.  cctlds have to be able to 
>determine policies for themselves, only governed by what their indiividual 
>countries alllow.
>
>IMO, if there is to be any cooperation by the cctlds with ICANN, ICANN must 
>recognize the autonomy of the cctlds.

That's exactly what I have been saying in my message :-) However, there is a
number of things that should be standardized as much as possible. For
example: it is true that some ccTLDs might choose (or be forced by local
law) not to publish a registrant's home address, but those who do should
possibly use the same format so that when you make WHOIS queries around the
world you are sure about how to read the result whenever available. Simple
things like that, free to adopt for any TLD that likes them, can make life
easier to all users without limiting the TLD's freedom - and in fact are
what I would consider a correct interpretation of the role of "coordinator".
-- 
vb.               [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<------
--------> http://bertola.eu.org/ - Archivio FAQ e molto altro... <--------
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html