ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] FW: Comment from the gTLD Registry Constituency


On Tuesday 01 October 2002 02:35 pm, Cassidy Sehgal wrote:
> Its implicit in the position. Further, I've heard it said many times "Users
> should not have a role in determining the policies/rules/processes/code
> that registries/registrars are forced to implement."
>
>
>
>                        -rwr

I disagree.  Under the present circumstances, where users are detrementally 
impacted by policy with little or no choice of alternatives, they must have a 
voice in any policy regardless of how it is to be implemented.  As long as 
policy is uniform among all registries and policy impacts an interested party 
there must be a voice.

The real solution is for ICANN to simply stay out of business practices policy 
and allow the users to choose what registries they are willing to do business 
with.   However, until there is *real* choice among many gTLDs, it is all 
moot, IMO.  Users must have a substantial vote on any policy that impacts 
them under present conditions.

Leah

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>