<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] IPv6 and child pornographers
James and all assembly members, stakeholders or other interested parties,
James Seng wrote:
> Oh, these problem don't exist in IPv4?
Actually, no they don't. Most of these security problems are
specific to IPv6 as part of the IPv6 design.
>
>
> "Security" is a loaded word, but to who involved in "Information Security",
> there are five pillars, namely: Confidentity, Availability, Integrity,
> Privacy and Non-reputation.
Right here. IPv6 does not meet any of these criterion adequately,
and several not at all. Not at all are: Confidentity, and Privacy.
Not adequately: Information Security, Integrity and Non-reputation.
Although IPv6 come close to Non-reputation.
>
>
> Unfortunately, in designing a protocol, some of the requirements conflict
> with the pillars.
Exactly right in some cases.
>
>
> In this case, IP exist is uniquely *identify* machines on the network. By
> that definition, privacy (as you defined it) does not exist.
Sure it exists! Where or how do you come to such an exacting
conclusion?
> However, there
> are limited privacy because other than the IP address, they know nothing
> else about you.
True enough! But with that as a start, allot more can be found out
as you PC/Server is now effectively hacked when using IPv6 when
implemented using auto-install. For an individual user with a static
IPv6 IP address, he/she has no option. Hence, he/she are
vulnerable to privacy loss as well as open to seriptious viruses
and identity theft. That's just not expectable, nor secure.
>
>
> How about another approach Joe? Since you are obviously so intelligent to
> spot this "security" problem that none of the IPv6 engineers have, why not
> propose a solution and stop "crying wolf"?
IPv8!
>
>
> -James Seng
>
> From: "Joe Baptista" <baptista@dot-god.com>
> > Well this is my last article on IPv6 - the next will deal with
> > infrastructure.
> >
> > October 9, 2002, IPv6: In Search Of Internet Security
> > http://www.circleid.com/articles/2543.asp
> >
> > It is important that members of the GA consider the privacy implications
> > of IPv6 - dissendents in china will be liberated and so will child
> > pornographers. My other two artticles are also posted below.
> >
> > September 12, 2002, Overcoming IPv6 Security Threat
> > http://www.circleid.com/articles/2533.asp
> >
> > September 25, 2002, IPv6 Transition: Preparing For The Big Shift
> > http://www.circleid.com/articles/2539.asp
> >
> > Cheers
> > Joe Baptista
> >
> > --
> > Planet Communications & Computing Facility
> > a division of The dot.GOD Registry, Limited
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> >
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 127k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 972-244-3801
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|