[ga] The lesson of .INT (and TLD's)

["Ray Fassett" <ray@fassett.org>]

Kent Crispen writes (twice):

"Indeed.  There are several legacy domains in .int that don't meet the
criteria."

At least there seems to be a measurement of such criteria to evaluate.  A
documented baseline, if you will, to point to for you (or anyone) to arrive
at such a conclusion.  Can you offer any reason ICANN has yet to do the
same at the Top Level, even after repeated request?  Is this an
unreasonable request?  Is not the logic the same as you are pointing out
for .INT but at the second level?  How could you even respond without being
able to cite this:

"See http://www.iana.org/int-dom/ for a description of the policies."

Why does ICANN refuse to do the same but for the Top Level?  Is this beyond
ICANN's scope?  Is this beyond ICANN's abilities?  Is this beyond ICANN's
expertise?  How many other answers could there be?  Can you offer any I
have not thought of?

Ray

-- 



--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html