Re: [ga] Legal Briefing

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

Well now that is amazing.
Is this what the DoC is trying to tell us?
Is this what Babtista and Fleming and Leah and some ccTLDs are going for?
What would happen if we all agreed, rabid individualists like myself,
registrars and registries and inclusives and ccs and gs?  And you know what? I
think we do.
Which brings us to the conclusion that less ICANN is a better ICANN.
e

"Michael D. Palage" wrote:

> I do not disagree. In fact, absent compelling circumstances, I believe that
> in the absence of actual documented consensus, Registries and Registrars
> should allow the market to determine what works and what doesn't works so
> there is choice for the consumer.
>
> Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Roessler [mailto:roessler-mobile@does-not-exist.info]
> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 4:01 PM
> To: Michael D. Palage
> Cc: eric@hi-tek.com; ga@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [ga] Legal Briefing
>
> On 2002-10-21 14:55:21 -0400, Michael D. Palage wrote:
>
> > I never said that people and businesses that register and use
> > domain names are not important. They in fact have the ultimate
> > responsibility of speaking with their wallet in choosing their
> > registrar of record and what tld they register in.
>
> Which permits precisely _zero_ choice when uniform policies are
> concerned.
>
> --
> Thomas Roessler (mobile)        <roessler-mobile@does-not-exist.org>
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html