ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Interesting WIPO ruling re: NewZealand.biz


David Farrar wrote:

>
>As a point of principle I don't believe any registrant who is
>operating in good faith should lose their domain name due to
>retrospective policy changes.
>
>.........
>
>So good idea to tighten up criteria for .int but kicking out current
>registrants would set a fairly nasty thin end of the wedge principle.
>

Agree.
I donīt think that current "bona fide" registrants in .int will be kicked 
out, but on one hand, given the small number thereof, it should be possible 
to get to a transaction with them so that the migration out could be 
consensual, and on the other hand, for new registrants it should be made 
clear that they are allowed the use of the name as long as they comply with 
the charter, and as soon as this condition is no longer verified, the loss 
of the name should be automatic.

Regards
Roberto


_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online 
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>