ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] ga chair elections


I for one do not see a point to the ALAC.

It has no voting power and no board representation.  Seems like a great 
place to waist and enormous amount of energy.

~k

At 10:40 AM 11/20/2002 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
>On 2002-11-20 14:54:26 +1300, DPF wrote:
>
> > - Seeking consensus on how best to maintain a discussion forum
> > where ICANN can be discussed by any interested party
>
>While ICANN has indeed abolished the GA as a bylaw element, there's
>also the recommendation that the GA mailing list should continue to
>be operated by the DNSO until the ALAC can take over.
>
>As I said before, this list won't die.
>
>--
>Thomas Roessler                        http://log.does-not-exist.net/
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>