<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Re: FC: Update on John Gilmore's lawsuit over secret FAA regulations
Declan, John and all,
Well it looks like ole John got hoist on his own petard this time. >;)
But I must agree with him anyway as this sort of infringement on privacy
seems
very verbose. So John, where the hell were you three years ago? I know
where you were. You were FOR this sort of intrusion than...
So John I guess this means that we will not be seeing you in Amsterdam
for the ICANN meeting due to your lack of proper ID? >:)
Declan McCullagh wrote:
> Previous Politech message:
>
> "John Gilmore sues Feds over secret your-papers-please rule"
> http://www.politechbot.com/p-03776.html
>
> ---
>
> To: declan@well.com, gnu@new.toad.com
> Subject: Re: FC: Transportation Security Admin. confirms do-not-fly list
> In-reply-to: <5.1.1.6.0.20021114234904.0589a6d0@mail.well.com>
> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 02:16:58 -0800
> From: John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com>
>
> The US Government has responded to my lawsuit challenging the
> unpublished air-ID regulations. In summary, they argue that I can't
> challenge the no-fly list or anything other than the ID demand
> because, having never shown ID, the no-fly list was not applied to me;
> that I can't sue in a District Court anyway because the Court of
> Appeals is supposed to have original jurisdiction; that the government
> can make any rule it wants which relates to air security, and penalize
> the public over violations, without ever telling the public what the
> rule is; that being refused passage unless I present an ID does not
> infringe my constitutional right to travel anyway; that being
> prevented from traveling anoymously does not implicate any First
> Amendment interests; that all forms of airport security are fully
> constitutional 4th-Amendment searches; and that since my right to
> travel is not being infringed, these searches give me equal protection
> just like all members of the public, because any 'rational' reason for
> singling me out will suffice.
>
> The regulations I'm challenging purport to require air and train
> travelers to show a "government issued ID". Every traveler has been
> subjected to these "requirements", but it turns out that they aren't
> really required by any published law or regulation. And if you refuse
> to meet the supposed requirements, you find out that there are
> alternative requirements, that they weren't telling you about.
>
> It is easy for the government to single out members of Greenpeace, and
> prevent them from flying using a no-fly list, by making everyone show
> ID to fly. (If no ID was required, any persecuted minority would soon
> learn to fly under assumed names.) The Nixon Administration had its
> "enemies list", who it subjected to IRS audits and other harassment.
> But even that evil President didn't prevent his "enemies" from
> moving around the country to associate with anyone they liked. The
> Bush Administration's list interferes with freedom of association and
> with the constitutional right to travel.
>
> As my experience on July 4th, 2002, in the San Francisco airport
> demonstrated, people are free to not show ID, if they spend half an
> hour arguing with security personnel. But then, catch-22, they can
> board the plane only if they'll submit to a physical search like
> the ones they subjected Green Party members and other "on the list"
> people to.
>
> So, you can identify yourself to them and be harassed for your
> political beliefs, unconstitutionally. Or you can stand up for your
> right to travel anonymously, and be searched unconstitutionally. Or
> you can just not travel. That's why I'm suing the government.
>
> The government motion to dismiss my case is filed at:
>
> http://cryptome.org/gilmore-v-usa-fmd.pdf
>
> The index to all the related documents is at:
>
> http://cryptome.org/freetotravel.htm
>
> We will be filing our reply by the end of November.
>
> John Gilmore
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
> You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
> To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
> This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
> Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Like Politech? Make a donation here: http://www.politechbot.com/donate/
> Recent CNET News.com articles: http://news.search.com/search?q=declan
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 127k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 972-244-3801
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|