<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [ga] Open call to join ICANNATLARGE.ORG
On 19:17 30/12/02, Walter Schmidt said:
>...since you asked
> TITLE 26 (the United States Internal Revenue Code, Title 26 of the U.S.
> Code (26 USC) ),
Thank you. The only one I am really interested in as a Frehchman is 47 USC
230 (f)(1) which creates the ICANN problem. The rest is your own system,
however:
>but only if no part of its activities involve the provision of athletic
>facilities or equipment
is this the reason why they want to kill the GA as a place for pathletic
debates :-)?
>no substantial part of the activities of which is carrying on propaganda,
>or otherwise attempting, to influence legislation (except as otherwise
>provided in subsection
seems to be the core of the ICANN activity: to carry active propaganda for
legislations in favor of the UDRP and so forth? They opposed .kid.us
leading to a legislation. They lead to the ACPA. Are there so many PACs
succeeding an getting an act voted every other year? Plus GAC reports and
Laws they influence worldwide. Seem to be active propangadists? Does not
ICP stand for ICANN Common Propaganda ?
jfc
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|