Re: Re[4]: [ga-icann] You gotta wonder

["NameCritic" <watch-dog@inreach.com>]

Rerally WXW calm down. It was not a shining example. The curly thing on the
end indicates that it was a question.

Chris McElroy aka NameCritic

----- Original Message -----
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
To: "NameCritic" <watch-dog@inreach.com>
Cc: "ga - icann" <ga-icann@dnso.org>
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 9:41 PM
Subject: Re[4]: [ga-icann] You gotta wonder


> Hello NameCritic,
>
> Friday, June 29, 2001, 9:33:51 PM, NameCritic wrote:
> > Back to the subject please. Is the legacy root so fragile? If so we
should
> > be really worried. other roots with thousands of tlds are operating. The
dns
> > is not broken.
>
> Other roots and TLDs that are barely used and are most certainly NOT
> scalable.
>
> Why don't you stick to some facts and evidence to back up your claims,
> Chris?
>
> The fact is that the alt.roots are a poor choice to use an example of
> how new TLDs will work.  They are more an example of how they should
> not work.
>
> You claim the alt.roots are stable?
>
> I take you mean the Baptista Vortex when you talk about how stable
> things are, right?
>
> The alt.root networks are VERY Fragile.  Most of them are open to
> cache poisoning and other security issues.  The only reason those
> things haven't happened yet is that they get so little use.
>
> Your shining example isn't one.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
> Userfriendly.com Domains
> The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
> DNS Services from $1.65/mo
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-icann@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-icann" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-icann@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-icann" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html