<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga-review] Re: Proposal to Merge the Business and IntellectualProperty Constituency
Why don't we set up about ten questions to send to them?
1. What are the idealogical differences in your missions?
2. Are the majority of your members linked to others constituencies?
3. Are you opposed to merging?
4. etc etc
Sincerely,
Danny Younger wrote:
> As outreach is part of the consensus building process, perhaps we should
> invite representatives of these constituencies to air their views on this
> topic. They may have a point of view that we are not taking into account,
> and they should assuredly be afforded the opportunity to participate in
> dialogue on this issue. Would it be advisable to extend such an invitation
> at this time, or is it preferable to continue for a while with further
> discussion?
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|