Re: [ga-roots] MOTION - Consensus-Based Policy on Alt Roots

["Patrick Corliss" <patrick@corliss.net>]

Hi William

> There is no way anyone could claim that such a proposal has any kind
> of consensus, nor that RFC1591 supports the alt.root claim.
>
> Any effort to try and advance this as a consensus policy would be
> illegitimate.

Perhaps you could re-read the proposal.  It is AGAINST alt roots.  I cannot
see how ICANN should not wish to foster compliance !!!!!!

With your excellent writing skills, could you suggest how it could be
improved.

Regards
Patrick Corliss

> Tuesday, May 08, 2001, 8:10:52 PM, Patrick Corliss wrote:

> > As the role of the DNSO General Assembly is to provide consensus-based
> > policy input to ICANN, I have asked everybody that they think that
> > consensus-based policy should be?  I therefore move the following policy
> > should be adopted by ICANN:
>
> > "ICANN adopts compliance with the relevant DNS standards as a general
> > principle.  It recognises that there is a likelihood of collision and/or
> > confusion when root operators do not comply with RFC 1591 which suggests
> > that there should be a "unique root zone*.  ICANN will therefore adopt
> > methods and measures to foster co-operation and compliance within the
> > industry."
>
> > Any seconders?


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html