Re: [ga-roots] Community Roots or Red Herrings

["NameCritic" <watch-dog@inreach.com>]

Several reasons.

1. ICANN's bylaws indicate they are to form a "bottom up" consensus. They
have not done so.
2. ICANN's policies and decisions to date have NOT been in the best interest
of those it was formed to serve.
3. When something is broke, you fix it.

Chris McElroy aka NameCritic

----- Original Message -----
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
To: "Patrick Corliss" <patrick@corliss.net>
Cc: "Darryl Lynch" <dassa@dhs.org>; "[ga-roots]" <ga-roots@dnso.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 9:18 AM
Subject: Re: [ga-roots] Community Roots or Red Herrings


> Hello Patrick,
>
> Thursday, May 10, 2001, 7:45:17 AM, Patrick Corliss wrote:
> > You are still avoiding the issue.  What policy should ICANN adopt?
>
> And you are still avoiding the issue.
>
> Why is a policy necessary?
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh
> mailto:william@userfriendly.com
> Owner, Userfriendly.com
> Userfriendly.com Domains
> The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
>
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html