<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga-roots] Re: [ga] Alternate Root Memo sent to Names Council
- To: "[ga-roots]" <ga-roots@dnso.org>
- Subject: [ga-roots] Re: [ga] Alternate Root Memo sent to Names Council
- From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 20:29:50 +0200
- Cc: Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>
- In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.0.20010517152122.02461d40@pop.wanadoo.fr>
- Mail-Followup-To: "[ga-roots]" <ga-roots@dnso.org>,Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>
- References: <5.0.2.1.0.20010516223548.034bab00@pop.wanadoo.fr> <5.0.2.1.0.20010516223548.034bab00@pop.wanadoo.fr> <5.0.2.1.0.20010517152122.02461d40@pop.wanadoo.fr>
- Sender: owner-ga-roots@dnso.org
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
[I'm taking this over to ga-roots.]
On 2001-05-17 15:49:46 +0200, Jefsey Morfin wrote:
>>>Otherwise I will sue you and the iCANN for hacking. i.e.
>>>imposing data in my machine that I do not want. In a very
>>>similar way to a cookie.
>>Do you seriously consider a cookie "hacking"? Something your
>>software takes from an HTTP header and chooses to stores on your
>>disk is supposed to be "hacking"? When are you going to sue,
>>say, Microsoft for hacking your machine?
>tss, tss, as usual Thomas you object the obvious if I say it:
>would this be some personnal/national feud?
First, I _strongly_ object against your allegation that I'm pursuing
a "national feud". In fact, I'm considering this allegation to be
insulting. (And, Jefsey, I'm not pursuing a personal feud, either.
Are you?)
Second, you don't state "the obvious" - in fact, it's hard to
understand what you are trying to state.
>The use of the cookie image is not about the intrusion definition
>(in this case a monopolistic enforcement) but image about the
>result. It is well established that we are entitled to refuse
>cookies because we are authoritative as far as what we want on our
>disks and what we want to disclose. The same way we are entitled
>to establish an authoritative root on our machine not to
>receive/give data from certain sites/tlds.
If all this is so obvious, maybe you can explain in simple words
what precisely the "hacking" you want to sue people for is all
about? I really just don't seem to get your point.
>>Surely you are joking...
>I would not dare with you: you might take it seriously :-)
A smiley doesn't make a bad joke better.
>>(To the physicists around: No, I don't believe Jefsey's a
>>genius. ;-)
>Well, I don't either! Actually my IQ is so low that I do not even
>understand why you limitate the comment to the physicits? Please
>fill free to include the chimists and the typists.
It was a pun on book titles: "Surely you are joking, Mr Feynman",
and "Genius". The latter is a Feynman biography by James Gleick.
--
Thomas Roessler http://log.does-not-exist.org/
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|