<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re[4]: [ga-roots] Jon Postel
Hello Josh,
Friday, May 25, 2001, 9:38:16 AM, Josh Elliott wrote:
> Which does not mean IANA did not have the authority...it meant that NSI
> refused to recognize IANA's authority in anything other than ccTLDs. At a
> later date, NSI refused to recognize IANA's authority for anything in the
> root without, including routine changes to nameserver information. Was that
> due to NSF refusing to recognize IANA's authority as well? Think
> again...that was simply a blatant refusal by NSI.
> IANA's contractual obligation which is found in a number of
> NSF/ARPA/Research contracts does not limit IANA's authority to ccTLDs or
> specifically describe its authority over gTLDs. In other words, you nor I
> will ever be certain whether IANA had any authority other than the defacto
> support of the vast majority of the Internet community for nearly 30 years.
One would think that the NSF letter is a definitive answer to this
question, Josh.
--
Best regards,
William X Walsh
mailto:william@userfriendly.com
Owner, Userfriendly.com
Userfriendly.com Domains
The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|