Re[2]: Why ICANN should think (Re: Re[2]: [ga-roots] RE: [ga] Can you give me some arguments, why is it a bad idea?)

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Hello Marc,

Saturday, June 02, 2001, 2:32:49 AM, Marc Schneiders wrote:
>> > Stability, stability, stability?
>> 
>> ICANN has that without the alt.roots.  ICANN has that by completely
>> ignoring them.

> Sure, one can also ignore bicycles as a car driver and survive. Those
> on the bike might get killed in the process. But my guess is, that
> your car will not look nice after a few collisions.

> Your stability is one established by force and fight.  

The only way you can make your point is to go to excess.

Comparing this situation to car collisions has to be one of the most
outrageous analogies I've seen used.

And it doesn't help your position at all.


-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh
mailto:william@userfriendly.com
Owner, Userfriendly.com
Userfriendly.com Domains
The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html