ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-roots]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga-roots] Two standards


Stephan and all assembly members,

Stefan Probst wrote:

> At 17:34 02.06.01 -0700, Jeff Williams wrote:
> -------------------------
> >   There are a few things that are a bit out of kilter here Marc.  First,
> >ICANN is not backed by the USG completely.  It enjoys a contractual
> >arrangement with DOC/NTIA that has certain requirements that must
> >be met.  It has yet to meet all of those requirements.
>
> Could you pls. expand on this one?
> Which requirements are met already, and which ones not yet?

  The @large has not be adequately created yet.  No policy imposed by the
ICANN BoD has legitimacy as there is no measured consensus from the
stakeholder community. These are just two and both are interrelated...

>
>
> Also, does this contract consider any change in the landscape, as it
> happens now with New.net, or with the elimination of conflicting TLDs and
> the resulting increased viability of those "harmonized" TLDs?

  No.

>
>
> What would happen in the theoretical case that ICANN would unilaterally
> cancel that agreement, e.g. based on a changed situation?

  Unknown.  However there would likely be another contract let for
bid.

>
>
> Stefan

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>