Re[2]: [ga-roots] Names Council and Alternate Roots

[Stefan Probst <stefan.probst@opticom.v-nam.net>]

At 22:48 02.06.01 -0700, William X. Walsh wrote:
-------------------------
>The alternative roots out of scope for ICANN.  They have no relevance
>for ICANN at all.  There is no need for a policy recommendation, or
>anything else.
>
>They have no rights inside the ICANN controlled namespace, and ICANN
>has no rights inside the alt.root namespace.  They are mutually
>exclusive.

Sure.
The lamb says: I am not responsible for the Tiger's behaviour.
And instead of planning strategies etc. it just declares the problem as not 
existent?


>That the alt.roots use the ICANN root as their base is merely because
>they couldn't exist otherwise, not because of any inherent policy or
>legal requirements.

Most of the alt.roots do not use the ICANN root as their "base". There is 
either a misunderstanding, or a miswording.
A real alt.root in fact cannot use the ICANN root, because all their 
alt.TLDs wouldn't resolve.

Stefan

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html