[ga-roots] Re: ICANN Policy -- revised version

["Milton Mueller" <Mueller@syr.edu>]

Stuart:

I would request that you modify your statement to indicate that there 
currently is NO stated consensus policy on the adoption of TLD 
assignments by ICANN that are in use in alternate or competing roots.

I can prove easily that there is no policy: ICANN has explicitly avoided
a conflict in the case of .WEB, and it has created a conflict in the case
of .BIZ. Both decisions were off-the-cuff ones made by the Board in
November. But there is no documented policy process that would explain 
why they avoided conflict in one instance and not in another. 

The White Paper simply does not address the issue. Working Group C
did not address it. Nor did the Names Council resolution passing on 
WGC's recommendation to create new TLDs.

In your unilateral policy statement known as the "discussion draft,"
you made it clear that you do not like alternate roots. I would ask 
you to look beyond that, as it is irrelevant to the question I am raising. 
We must not confuse the question of whether there is a prior
policy with the question of WHAT the policy should be. We may agree
or disagree on the latter. But the only conclusion an honest person 
cam come to about the former is that it is a policy question that has
not been carefully defined and explored. 

>>> "M. Stuart Lynn" <lynn@icann.org> 06/14/01 04:23PM >>>
Danny -- I am still receiving final editorial and other clarification 
suggestions on my paper. I hope to have it complete in about a week 
or so.

Thanks for your interest.

Stuart

  At 1:48 PM -0400 6/14/01, Danny Younger wrote:
>Although the Names Council has decided, "that multiple roots are outside the
>scope of the ICANN DNSO", it is within the scope of the General Assembly to
>consider changes in ICANN's domain name policies.
>"The Supporting Organizations shall serve as advisory bodies to the Board,
>with the primary responsibility for developing and recommending substantive
>policies regarding those matters falling within their specific
>responsibilities."
>Our ICANN President has stated, "We already do have a policy, and we'd need
>to change that policy if we want to operate differently in the future."
>Director Abril comments, "Policy changes should go through policy process."
>The General Assembly is part of that process.  Should we desire to recommend
>any consensus-based changes, we need to begin with a full understanding of
>the current policy.
>We are however, at the moment hampered by the fact that we are still
>awaiting the revised version of our current policy draft.   Lynn:  "Will
>continue to take comments on single root paper and post a revised version.
>Board consensus."
>On behalf of the participants to this list, I will ask our President to post
>this revised version as soon as possible, so that the General assembly may
>better be positioned to put forward policy recommendations in a timely
>manner.

-- 

__________________
Stuart Lynn
President and CEO
ICANN
4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330
Marina del Rey, CA 90292
Tel: 310-823-9358
Fax: 310-823-8649
Email: lynn@icann.org 
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html 


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html