Re[2]: [ga-roots] Re[4]: [ga-icann] interesting California law to consider

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

Hello Stefan,

Sunday, June 17, 2001, 8:19:53 AM, Stefan Probst wrote:
>>You are so antiICANN without any possibility of being otherwise, that
>>you assume that anyone who doesn't blindly agree with the alt.root
>>position that let's any person who wants to create a TLD is 100%
>>behind everything ICANN says/does.

> William, your intimate knowledge of the alt.roots astonishes me more and more.
> Some weeks ago, I had a look at most of their websites, and found, that the 
> majority of them have some more or less stringent requirements concerning 
> which TLD they would include in their root.
> You know obviously more than their websites say.

References please?

There are no minimum standards or technical requirements at any of the
alt.roots that I am aware of.  If you know otherwise, please don't
just say it, point to the references.

That means that unless someone else, who also didn't meet any minimum
standards, emailed them that they wanted that string first, you can
have it, even if you don't know the difference between an MX record
and a CNAME record, much less how to setup a controlled managed dns
system for the domain.

-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
Userfriendly.com Domains
The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
DNS Services from $1.65/mo

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html