[ga-roots] .EU emerges ?

["Jim Fleming" <JimFleming@prodigy.net>]

Is this the new .EU ?

http://root-dns.org/VueDig/VueDig_3.php?tld=eu&record=NS
The PacificRoot : 204.107.129.2
VueDig Results : Answer = 2 : Authority = 0 : Additional = 2. 
eu. 2D IN NS ns1.nameslinger.com.
eu. 2D IN NS ns2.nameslinger.com.


Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Thomas Roessler" <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
To: "L Gallegos" <jandl@jandl.com>
Cc: <ga-roots@dnso.org>
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: [ga-roots] ICANN Policy -- revised version


> On 2001-06-18 12:04:50 -0400, L Gallegos wrote:
> 
> >The post referred to creation of roots and TLDs, not SLD 
> >registrations.  There are some three thousand TLDs and several 
> >roots that are new and more coming all the time.  I am not saying 
> >whether this is a good or bad thing, Dass, only that it is 
> >occurring.
> 
> >It also has nothing to do with whether any of the TLDs will be 
> >popular, open, restricted (chartered) or what business models will 
> >be utilized.  You took the post and changed the focus of the 
> >response to refer to SLDs.
> 
> That was me, not Dassa.
> 
> But anyway, I think that my question concerning the number of 
> registrations in your alternative TLD is one which should be 
> answered in order to be able to judge your remark on a TLD "rush" - 
> because, of course, we could start to count all those misconfigured 
> pseudo-intranets which are confusing SLDs and TLDs, and are 
> certainly contributing to the TLD zoo.  However, this zoo's 
> inhabitants are about as uninteresting for any ICANNesque 
> deliberations as it can get.
> 
> Also, a "rush" of alt.roots (and in TLDs being offered by these 
> alt.roots) which doesn't coincide with a corresponding rush of SLD 
> registrations under these TLDs very much looks like a rush of 
> childish fools trying to play Internic - which is, frankly, 
> something ICANN should indeed ignore, and on which even the 
> development of a III 3 b policy would be far too much effort and 
> honor.
> 
> (I suppose that Kent and friends will subsume (almost?) all 
> alt.roots in this category.)
> 
> -- 
> Thomas Roessler                        http://log.does-not-exist.org/
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html