ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-roots]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga-roots] Witnesses Wanted


On Sun, 01 Jul 2001 00:09:13 +1000, Len Lindon wrote:

> Naturally, a subpoena will be prepared
> to the list managers for production
> of the said emails and weblogs of the
> exact times I sent my message to the
> list and the first point in time at
> which wxw could lawfully have had
> access to that message.

Hi Len

I'm not sure what you are getting at here.  There were four messages.  The
details including the relevant times in the common Australian Eastern
Standard Time (AEST) are as follows:

----- Original Message -----
From: Len Lindon <info@humanrights.com.au>
To: <ga-roots@dnso.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 4:43 PM
Subject: [ga-roots] Microsoft case shows how ICANN breaches USA antitrust
laws

> Thursday's Microsoft ruling by the US Court of Appeals shows exactly
> how ICANN, a California corporation, breaches USA longstanding
> USA antitrust laws through its exclusionary contracts and activies.

----- Original Message -----
From: William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
To: Len Lindon <info@humanrights.com.au>
Cc: <ga-roots@dnso.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: [ga-roots] Microsoft case shows how ICANN breaches USA
antitrust laws

> Hello Len,
>
> Don't know much about US Laws or the legal systems do you?

----- Original Message -----
From: William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
To: Len Lindon <info@humanrights.com.au>
Cc: <ga-roots@dnso.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 5:09 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [ga-roots] Microsoft case shows how ICANN breaches USA
antitrust laws

> BTW, to clarify, under established case law governmental agencies are
> immune from antitrust laws, and so are private companies carrying out
> programs under authority from the government.

----- Original Message -----
From: Dot Humanrights Interim Trust <info@humanrights.com.au>
To: <ga-roots@dnso.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 5:12 PM
Subject: [ga-roots] ICANN CEO notified of current USA antitrust law
(Microsoft)

> ----------
> From: Dot Humanrights Interim Trust <info@humanrights.com.au>
> Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 17:09:23 +1000
> To: "M. Stuart Lynn" <lynn@icann.org>
> Subject: FW: [ga-roots] Microsoft case shows how ICANN breaches USA
> antitrust laws
>
> A copy of this email will be posted to ga-roots@dnso.org

It is clear from the headings that William X. Walsh was responding to your
first email.  The exact times of the four messages, according to my headers,
are respectively:

Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 16:43:51 +1000
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 16:54:41 +1000
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 17:09:13 +1000
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 17:12:18 +1000

Best regards
Patrick Corliss


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-roots@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-roots" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>