Re: [ga-rules] Daily post limits

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

Mr. Lovell,

While I would not judge such a thing, some may suspect something here.
I am a great watcher of current.  Perhaps it is because I was partially
raised running the rapids of the great Colorado River of the Grand
Canyon.  However it may be your current has changed over the last few
days to a recognizable alliance. I believe we could all benefit greatly
by your wonderful independent thought.

I mean nothing negative by this post and I learn a great deal by your
input and hope very sincerely that it continues in what ever capacity,
and gladly second you as chair of any of the sublists.

Sincerely,
Eric

"William S. Lovell" wrote:

> Question came up in my mind the other day, and that is
> the daily posting limit and its applicability to chairs and
> alternate chairs and whoever else has some -- now hold
> your breath on this one -- actual job to do on behalf of
> the General Assembly.  Seems to me that any such person
> who does the job would use up the allotment on "official"
> stuff and never have the chance to speak out as a person.
> Wouldn't it be more just to dump that rule for "official
> types" who need to post official things? Or at least not
> count the official ones? What's the actual practice here?
>
> Bill Lovell
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-rules@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-rules" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-rules@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-rules" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html