<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga-rules] Mailing List Management
Patrick and all,
Patrick Corliss wrote:
> My overall view is to have "virtual" constituencies. In other words all of
> the ISPs will have one mailing list. The individuals another. Businesses a
> third. And so on. With working groups on particular issues like the
> Alternate Roots, Trade Marks and Registration Systems.
This is a bit of a mischaracterization. Our [INEGroup] members are
represented by a broad spectrum of interests that have a common
goal and specific purposes. Hence with WG's set up in separate
ML's for communication/discussion/debate seem to me to be
a method of fragmenting the "Interested Parties" or otherwise
stakeholders.
>
>
> The whole idea needs to be better defined and I'd like to see the issue
> discussed on the GA-RULES mailing list. Some members, particularly William
> X. Walsh, Jeff Williams and Dassa Lynch have their own views which I'd like
> to see canvassed. Of course, I am assuming that people have a genuine
> interest in such a discussion.
My views are the views of our members as I am their spokesman...
I cannot speak for WXW or Darryl, aka Dessa...
>
>
> As it is now, we have three dedicated mailing lists. UDRP which is really
> Trade Mark interests. Alternate Roots which could become a constituency.
> Systems which is really Registrars and Registration Service Providers.
> Let's call those Working Groups (WGs) or Special Interest Groups (SIGs) with
> dedicated people.
>
> Those people understand the issues relevant to their subject. The main GA
> list is really a "control" program of everybody. The GENERAL assembly then
> decides that an issue is worth discussing. They can create a "terms of
> reference" and refer the matter to one of the WGs. A good example is WHOIS
> privacy in relation to the European Community.
>
> The WG or SIG can come up with a policy recommendation and refer it back to
> the main membership for a vote. Does that make sense or not?
>
> Let's say the WHOIS issue is handled by GA-SYS. You could call them WG-SYS
> if you prefer. They come up with a recommendation on the Administration
> Contact. Simple enough. Let's say the recommendation is "that the
> Administration Contact is the agent of the Registrant and the Registrant may
> redelegate that authority at any time". Fine. We have a vote. Adopted.
> Passed to ICANN as having consensus among all the participants.
>
> So the WG Chair is the "input-output control" of the Group. Just like any
> other Chair of a sub-committee, investigative study or panel. It's what we
> do in Australia. There's a Terms of Reference (INPUT) and a report
> (OUTPUT). Meanwhile the WG just chugs along doing its stuff.
>
> William X. Walsh sees such a system as open to capture and I agree that
> there is a danger of that. There are two arguments against that view:
>
> First that everybody who is interested in a subject can join a working group
> of their choice. One person may not be particularly interested in, say,
> UDRP or WHOIS systems. They can choose not to participate.
>
> Second that everything must come back to the GA list for final approval. If
> that list was kept light (as a control program) then you could require
> everybody to join it i.e. set up the system so that everybody who joins a
> sublist must be a member of the main GA list.
>
> The big advantage of dedicated Special Interest Groups is that you WILL get
> some work done.
>
> Regards
> Patrick Corliss
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-rules@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-rules" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-rules@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-rules" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|