<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga-rules] Re: Definition of Motions & Procedures
--On onsdag, juni 27, 2001 08:26:41 -0700 "William S. Lovell"
<wsl@cerebalaw.com> wrote:
> I would suggest that this suggestion would be ineffective to do
> anything except continue the "chat room" syndrome. Endless
> "votes" on endless motions do not constitute decision making,
> but only playing around.
My point exactly; we need a process that can somehow be forced to converge
in finite time, yet not be easily manipulable by people who understand the
rules to produce outcomes that the majority do not want.
I do not know if this is possible; I know that I don't know of a current
system that works.
Harald
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-rules@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-rules" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|