Re: Re[2]: [ga-rules] Re: Consensus

["NameCritic" <watch-dog@inreach.com>]

I agree or how about me too? We put a lot of time into this and sometimes a
short answer in support is all we have time for but feel it important to
show that we agree about something when it isn't obvious we would agree,
such as me agreeing with William here.

Chris McElroy aka NameCritic

----- Original Message -----
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
To: "Patrick Corliss" <patrick@quad.net.au>
Cc: "[ga-rules]" <ga-rules@dnso.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 11:41 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [ga-rules] Re: Consensus


> Hello Patrick,
>
> While most "discussion" lists discourage "me too" type posts, I really
> don't think that this should be done on a list like the GA lists,
> where one of the things we do is gauge support for concepts.
>
> Let's not let discussions of rules start to get us to get carried
> away with them either.
>
> Wednesday, June 27, 2001, 11:36:35 AM, Patrick Corliss wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 27 Jun 2001 09:41:18 -0700, Eric Dierker wrote:
>
> >> Joanna,
> >> Great move and I fully support it.
> >> Eric
>
> > <Joanna's original post snipped>
>
> > Hi Eric
>
> > The above message is what is generally referred to as a "me too" post.
As
> > indicated by the name, it is a post which does not advance the debate
but
> > merely expresses agreement with a previous posting.  These are not
covered
> > under the current list rules and protocols.
>
> > Of course, in trying to evaluate consensus it may be necessary for list
> > members to gain some appreciation of the support or otherwise of any
> > particular proposal.  This can only be gauged through the responses of
other
> > list members.
>
> > However, I am sure members wish to see the debate being advanced with a
> > higher content to noise ratio.  It is probably better, I would have
thought,
> > to avoid unnecessary posts of the "me too" variety, or even urges to
"try
> > harder", in favour of thoughtful comments of substance.
>
> > Should people feel compelled to post simple responses, it would be
useful
> > for them to trim any previous postings as much as possible.  Otherwise
it is
> > often necessary to scroll down to the bottom of a long email just to see
if
> > there are any further comments.
>
> > Whilst bandwith may no longer be a factor, even a 4KB post adds up when
> > circulated to over 300 list members.  However, many members will
endeavour
> > to store list messages.  As well, it is often time-wasting to browse or
> > search through the overly long list archives.
>
> > As a result many lists rules require much more of an effort in quoting
and
> > trimming.
>
> > Best regards
> > Patrick Corliss
>
>
>
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga-rules@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga-rules" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
> Userfriendly.com Domains
> The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
> DNS Services from $1.65/mo
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-rules@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-rules" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-rules@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-rules" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html